Sunday, August 14, 2011
Anyone who has a blog, though its readership may measure well into the lower single digits, understands that to begin blogging again after a long absence begs an explanation. So here’s mine: in the months that I have been silent, nothing of international, nay, universal import, has compelled me to write. I have this work gig, tennis gig, voice gig, painting gig, etc. that have consumed most of my discretionary time recently. And until now, I haven’t had a reason with enough importance to weigh-in on any debate of national or international significance. In fact, I’ve probably dawdled a bit in getting to this particular post. But here it is – George Clooney needs to date someone whose IQ surpasses her TVQ. Yes, this is a bloggervention.
If you’ve been exposed to a television (particularly in a public location), stood in a supermarket checkout line or have been forced to read publications of the “People” or “US Weekly” ilk while waiting for a professional service, you know that Clooney and his potential life partner, some obscure (although less so, thanks to Clooney) Italian model, have parted ways. Needless to say in these situations, there is no shortage of speculation about who will be next to occupy a place in his heart and his Lake Como villa. Mostly this list is populated by women who have devoted their life’s work to activities that involve standing in front of a camera. Many have found time to get their GED. While I can’t begin to predict who it might be, owing to my complete lack of exposure to popular culture predicative models for celebrity dating, I can say the type of woman I think it should be.
First of all, there are certain assumptions. Well, actually, one: Clooney can pretty much date whomever he wants. That’s pretty cool. But who should he want? That’s where my invaluable advice comes in.
Age. (Appropriate) First and foremost, he should find someone in the general vicinity of his own age, say 10 years. If we’re to believe that wisdom grows with life experience and, as a consequence, aging, a woman who is 45 has more to contribute than someone who is 25.
Education. I’m thinking an academic pedigree similar to Samantha Power’s or Condoleezza Rice’s*, both in terms of the institutions (Harvard, Stanford) and subject matter of international affairs. While Clooney may not have formal training in international relations (the policy, not the interpersonal type, the latter of which he is an unsurpassed content expert), he has devoted a fair amount of his free time promoting and supporting humanitarian efforts internationally.
Accomplishment. Again using Power and Rice (hey, that sounds like a humanitarian relief effort in and of itself) as examples, George should find someone who has actually achieved more with her life than landing a minor role in “Deuce Bigelow, American Gigolo.”
My final plea: George (may I call you George?), you’ve proven you can attract (young) women that score high on the babelicious scale. But I’m speculating you’d find more happiness with a woman whose contributions to society will not be forgotten once the tabloids hit the round file. Just a guess; I could be wrong.
*Yes, I realize that Power is married (but if George hadn’t been dallying with a woman who hosted music videos for the past couple of years, he might have had a chance) and Rice’s politics may be a bit, um, conservative, but these are just examples, people.
Labels:
George Clooney
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About this blog
This blog's title comes from Ariel's Song in Shakespeare's The Tempest.
Full fathom five they father lies,
Of his bones are coral made,
Those are pearsl that were his eyes;
Nothing of him doth fade,
But doth suffer a sea-change
into something rich and strange.
Full fathom five they father lies,
Of his bones are coral made,
Those are pearsl that were his eyes;
Nothing of him doth fade,
But doth suffer a sea-change
into something rich and strange.
Powered by Blogger.

1 comments:
At least I qualify in the age department.
Post a Comment